DSLR Tips – Choosing an “All around” lens

DSLR Tips - Choosing an

The process of deciding on a “walkaround” – “carry around” lens is different for everyone but here is some talk on the subject.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Related Articles:

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

Comments

  1. athlonx236 says:

    what about Tamron SP AF17-50mm 17-50 f/2.8 XR ?

  2. hougiiou says:

    @nate42nd wow thanks this has really helped, iv found it just in my price range on one site and well it look like it could do alot better the the 18-135mm

    once again thank you :)

  3. nate42nd says:

    @hougiiou With that budget you could get a 70-200 F/4L (NOT the 2.8).It’s a large lens and is not wide but it might work for you. If you need a wider lens the 18-135 is good. Not nearly as good as the 70-200 but would let you get a wider shot. These are the lenses I would look at. There are many more however. All the best.

  4. hougiiou says:

    i need help, in need an all-round lens on a budget of about £400 or $600 and i want to buy a lens thats good for taking stills but would be good for filming sports like mountain biking and such. What lens should i go for ?

  5. ahsergio says:

    I’ll buy a t2i by the beginning of march, im still in doubt about the lens of the starter kit. My doubt lies between 18-55mm IS or 18-135mm IS. In another video you recommended the 135 for beginners and so far i believe it will be my choice, but my concern is if ill be able to take family pictures with it (that wont be my main purpose, but eventually, i’d like to have a good quality pic of my family). In this case,would the 18-55 be more versatile than the 18-135? Great tutorials by the way!

  6. CAJUNNSC says:

    24 – 70 2.8 is going to run you 1800 bucks average. Again you are talking specialty lens. I thought you were answering the question ” best walk around lens ” and you mentioned a few more then one! Seems impossible to answer that question in one word. But I’ll do it here for ya! The very best walk around lens is ” 18mm – 105mm 3.5 – 5.G D VR ” if your a Nikon shooter. Price average 400 bucks and it will be well worth your investment. You’ll find yourself using it more then anything in your bag !

  7. CAJUNNSC says:

    You mentioned first of all the budget minded, the 17-55 2.8 is 1500 bucks plus and it’s a specialty lens. Hence the price. Believe it or not one of the best lens you can carry is your standard kit 18-55 yep ! I’m telling you use it and you’ll find out. The quality is very good and it will save you time and trouble in a pinch. VR is going to serve you well and if you carry a 50mm and 1 85 or 105 prime you’re set for all except wildlife. Remember most watching this aren’t pros! Thanks

  8. @panadesu Yes, the 85mm is a good choice. If you were going to get that one I would get the 100mm macro instead. That way you could use it for close ups AND portraits from the waist up. You would have to back up but it’s a very sharp and well made lens.

  9. @nate42nd Thanks for replying.
    My friends and i where talking about cropped cameras (i have an eos450d) and that it might not be a good idea for me to purchase a 85mm lens as it would “zoom in” (for a lack of a better word) giving me a hard time in my little studio . (im guessing thats what they meant) What im looking for is a lens suitable for macro (closeup of lips) and great for shooting models waist up. What do you think? Is the 85mm prime a good choice?

  10. DoCWaSaBe says:

    God I love the 50mm 1.8, its cheap and has really good performance!

  11. @panadesu Most lenses can focus with 3M of space. I am not sure quite what you’re asking but I have come to believe the 24-105 F/4L is the best “all around” lens for me. It can focus to .45M The 50mm 1.4 is also good if you don’t need zoom. It sounds like a studio setting. The 24-70 F2.8L would also be a great choice. There are many more for less money if that’s a problem.

  12. I hope you have time to help me out a bit on what lens would suit me best? I usually shoot in studio, i would like to get up really close taking pictures of lips and get all the details without my lens acting up (like it does now, unable to focus) While being able to shoot from waist and up. sharp and crisp images (no blur) i have 3m of space infront of the model to move (if that helps) :)

  13. poojuice123 says:

    get a better screen saver :E

  14. charvelgtrs says:

    24-70 2.8 lens would work well for most shots even on a cropped sensor. 24 acts like a 38mm on a crop sensor, so it will be wide enough to shoot indoors without a problem. Also, if you ever plan on moving to full-frame that lens will still work where as the 17-55mm 2.8 will only work on cropped sensors.

  15. nate42nd says:

    @kshitijchavan Depends on if you like close ups or landscapes when you say “natural” I would say a 17-55 Canon or maybe a 50mm macro or 100mm macro.

  16. kshitijchavan says:

    i m beginner so which lens i should use. m basicaly lik natural photography.
    plz reply

  17. nate42nd says:

    @kovacs111078 No hackintoshh…..I’m a Windows guy. I have 3 machines running in that room.

  18. kovacs111078 says:

    is is a hackintosh in the background of your clip?

  19. nate42nd says:

    @Failingromeo Good point. Lenses give a different FOV on crops but I like the 85mm and 100mm for portraits as well as the 50mm. They can all work, it depends on your style and how close you want to get.

  20. Failingromeo says:

    Fyi most portrait shooters love the 80mm but keep in mind that this lens is typically favored by guys using full frame. On a crop body (1.6) a 50mm will give u the same focal length.

  21. nate42nd says:

    @falopio2007 The 85mm is kind of a specialty lens. A good one. I would love a 85mm 1.8 Canon for portraits and still life. It’s good for a lot but not an “all around” lens.

  22. falopio2007 says:

    Thanks for your advice. I have replaced my Sigma 18-250mm f3.5-6.3 OS HSM zoom lens with a Canon 24-70mm 2.8L and a Canon 70-200 mm f2.8L IS USM II for my Canon 60D and the difference is amazing noticeable. In my opinion the 24-70mm is a very nice all around lens. What’s your opinion about a 85mm f1.4 as a possible choice to all do lens?

  23. FlamingShutter says:

    @nate42nd Hey Nate I agree with you. I think it just really depends on what type of photography you do. The full frame sensor is excellent, I am not gonna lie, and really does blow away crop sensor cameras in low light and ISO performance but that’s not to say that the 7D or the D7000 give bad results. I own two crop sensor cameras the 550D and the 50D and I love the crop sensor for the extra extension I get with my lenses. Its like you say it all depends on what your needs are.

  24. Failingromeo says:

    Redraider you are a tool

  25. msjpearson says:

    Thanks again for another interesting vid. Keep it up!

Speak Your Mind

*